From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Jetta Operating Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 11, 2016
NO. 02-15-00284-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-15-00284-CV

02-11-2016

YVONNE MORALES, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ELVIS HERNANDEZ, DECEASED, AS NEXT FRIEND OF BEYONCE HERNANDEZ, SEMAYA HERNANDEZ, AND EVELYN HERNANDEZ, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES, AND JOSE ANGEL HERNANDEZ APPELLANTS v. JETTA OPERATING COMPANY, INC. APPELLEE


FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 067-280251-15 MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

On January 11, 2016, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1). Appellants have not filed a motion or other response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants Yvonne Morales and Jose Angel Hernandez shall jointly and severally pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: February 11, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Morales v. Jetta Operating Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 11, 2016
NO. 02-15-00284-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Morales v. Jetta Operating Co.

Case Details

Full title:YVONNE MORALES, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Feb 11, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-15-00284-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)