From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Foods

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
LA CV21-08432 JAK (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

LA CV21-08432 JAK (MAAx)

12-29-2021

Nataly Morales v. John Kelly Foods, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than January 5, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses, as to John Kelly Foods. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morales v. Foods

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 29, 2021
LA CV21-08432 JAK (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Morales v. Foods

Case Details

Full title:Nataly Morales v. John Kelly Foods, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

LA CV21-08432 JAK (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)