From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Beard

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 2011
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-11-0692 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 19, 2011)

Summary

dismissing the claim against defendant Demming arising from his response to the prisoner's grievance regarding a prison transfer

Summary of this case from Walker v. Walsh

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-11-0692.

July 19, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2011, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt, to which no objects have been filed, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's complaint against all defendants, except Paul, Putnam and Zackarackus is dismissed with prejudice.
2. This case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings on plaintiff's claims against defendants Paul, Putnam and Zackarackus.


Summaries of

Morales v. Beard

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 2011
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-11-0692 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 19, 2011)

dismissing the claim against defendant Demming arising from his response to the prisoner's grievance regarding a prison transfer

Summary of this case from Walker v. Walsh
Case details for

Morales v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD T. MORALES Plaintiff v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 19, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-11-0692 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Walsh

Similarly, Plaintiff does not allege that Defendant Kaye participated in the decision to change Plaintiff's…

Skrip v. Butler

"[T]he law is clear that an inmate cannot recover for emotional injury if no physical harm is stated." (Doc.…