From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 12, 2008
No. CV 05-1230-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2008)

Opinion

No. CV 05-1230-PHX-SMM.

December 12, 2008


ORDER


On December 10, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals entered a mandate in this case. (Doc. 27.) The Ninth Circuit affirmed this Court regarding the need for a Vocational Expert and the typographical error. (Doc. 27-2, p. 2.) However, the Ninth Circuit reversed this Court's judgment in rejecting Plaintiff Debra Morales' subjective symptom and attendant limitations testimony absent clear and convincing evidence. (Id.) According to the appellate court, this rejection of testimony invalidated the Administrative Law Judge's residual functional capacity ("RFC") assessment. (Id. 2-5.) The Ninth Circuit remanded the case with instructions to remand to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings to determine Morales' credibility and to assess her RFC. (Id. p. 5.)

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on remand, the Commissioner shall assess Morales' credibility as well as her RFC. These proceedings may include additional factual development as needed.


Summaries of

Morales v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 12, 2008
No. CV 05-1230-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Morales v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA M. MORALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 12, 2008

Citations

No. CV 05-1230-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2008)