Opinion
No. 64931
07-23-2014
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition requesting genetic marker analysis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elissa F. Cadish, Judge.
This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
In his petition filed on January 8, 2014, appellant requested genetic marker analysis of semen and blood. Appellant asserted that he was not the source of either specimen and that DNA testing would demonstrate that he did not sexually assault the victim in this case. Appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility that he would not have been prosecuted or convicted had genetic marker analysis of the type he requested been conducted. See NRS 176.09183(l)(a). Appellant's defense at trial was that the victim consented to the sexual activity, and the identity of the assailant was not an issue in this case. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
--------
___________, J.
Pickering
___________, J.
Parraguirre
___________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge
Roy Daniels Moraga
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk