From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moraes v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 16, 2002
827 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-177

Opinion filed October 16, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Philip Bloom, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 99-24635.

Michael R. Miller, Orlando, and Gail Scopinich, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Carman, Beauchamp Sang and Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, for appellee Traffic Control Devices, Inc.

George, Hartz, Lundeen Fulmer and Michael L. Glass, Coral Gables, for appellee Homestead Concrete.

Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.


As the evidence is clear that the appellees had not taken physical possession of the work site and had not begun construction on it, the summary judgment is affirmed. See Verges v. Pacheco Sons, Inc., 822 So.2d 542 (Fla.3d DCA 2002); Cruz v. Gables Colony, Ltd., 579 So.2d 278 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Moraes v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 16, 2002
827 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Moraes v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MORAES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, A Municipal Corporation, State…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 16, 2002

Citations

827 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)