Opinion
Case No. SC05-145.
September 21, 2005.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to have the Third District Court of Appeal appoint counsel in his appeal below, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists.). All pending motions and other requests for relief are also denied.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.