From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mora v. Eaton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2021
2:14-cv-0581 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:14-cv-0581 KJM DB P

11-15-2021

ERIC MORA, Plaintiff, v. ZACK EATON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants failed to provide him timely medical treatment and caused him harm in violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment.

On October 7, 2021 counsel for plaintiff filed a notice stating plaintiff had “reached a full and complete settlement with the Defendants.” (ECF No. 125.) Thereafter, plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal with prejudice as to defendants Eaton, Gomer, and Sanderson (ECF No. 126) and a separate notice of dismissal with prejudice as to defendants Leslie and Kremer (ECF No. 127.) The court notes that defendants Wooten, Powell, and Nweke were dismissed on summary judgment. (See ECF No. 81.) Out of an abundance of caution the court will direct defendants to indicate whether they oppose the dismissal. Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date of this order defendants shall file a statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's notices of dismissal, or the parties shall file a stipulation for voluntary dismissal.


Summaries of

Mora v. Eaton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2021
2:14-cv-0581 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Mora v. Eaton

Case Details

Full title:ERIC MORA, Plaintiff, v. ZACK EATON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2021

Citations

2:14-cv-0581 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)