Opinion
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00199
11-01-2022
CELA MORA, “Plaintiff”, v. ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. ET AL., “Defendants”.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROLAND OLVERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are these pleadings: Defendants' “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” (“MTD”) (Dkt. No. 17), Plaintiffs “Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” (“Response”) (Dkt. No. 19), Defendants' “Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss” (“Reply”) (Dkt. No. 22) and Magistrate Judge's “Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 34). The R&R recommends this Court (1) grant Defendants' MTD (Dkt. No. 17); (2) dismiss all Plaintiffs claims; (3) deny Plaintiffs request for leave to amend her Complaint; and (4) direct the Clerk of the Court to close this case.
No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.
Defendants' MTD (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED. All Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs request for leave to amend her Complaint is DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case.