From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moquin v. Minn. ST.PAUL Sault Ste. Mar. R.R

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 8, 1930
181 Minn. 626 (Minn. 1930)

Opinion

No. 28,214.

August 8, 1930.

Case followed. [Reporter]

Defendant appealed from a judgment of the district court for Crow Wing county, Torrance, J. Affirmed upon authority of Moquin v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co. 181 Minn. 56, 231 N.W. 829.

John E. Palmer, James L. Hetland and Fryberger, Fulton Boyle, for appellant.

Davis, Michel Yaeger and Swanson, Swanson Swanson, for respondent.



The appeal is from a judgment. The case was here before and our opinion filed June 27, 1930. 181 Minn. 56, 231 N.W. 829. The questions involved upon this appeal are the same as those involved in the former appeal, and for the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion the judgment from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.


Summaries of

Moquin v. Minn. ST.PAUL Sault Ste. Mar. R.R

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 8, 1930
181 Minn. 626 (Minn. 1930)
Case details for

Moquin v. Minn. ST.PAUL Sault Ste. Mar. R.R

Case Details

Full title:MOQUIN v. MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL SAULT STE.MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 8, 1930

Citations

181 Minn. 626 (Minn. 1930)
231 N.W. 920

Citing Cases

Minneapolis Etc. Ry. v. Moquin

P. 521. 181 Minn. 56; 231 N.W. 920, reversed. CERTIORARI, 282 U.S. 833, to review a judgment sustaining a…