From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moppins v. Warden, Solano State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. 2:08-cv-0159 FCD JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-0159 FCD JFM (HC).

February 2, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 7, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 7, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Moppins v. Warden, Solano State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. 2:08-cv-0159 FCD JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Moppins v. Warden, Solano State Prison

Case Details

Full title:FRANK IRVIN MOPPINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, SOLANO STATE PRISON et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-0159 FCD JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)