From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moppins v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 17, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2708 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2708 WBS GGH P.

December 17, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 15, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 15, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's March 23, 2007 motion to dismiss is granted.


Summaries of

Moppins v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 17, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2708 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Moppins v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:FRANK IRVIN MOPPINS, Petitioner, v. TOM CAREY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2708 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2007)