Opinion
June 9, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wayne County, Strobridge, J.
Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because plaintiff has sufficient information to determine the identities of the prospective defendants to enable him to draft a complaint without the examination he seeks, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for preaction disclosure (see, Gorgoni v. Rapson, 166 A.D.2d 901; see also, CPLR 3102 [c]; Liberty Imports v. Bourguet, 146 A.D.2d 535, 536).