Opinion
Case No. 6:17-cv-00917-MK
05-27-2020
STEVEN C. MOOREHEAD, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendants.
ORDER
:
Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed his Findings and Recommendations ("F&R") (doc. 60) recommending that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 38) should be GRANTED. This case is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Plaintiff has filed timely objections. (doc. 64) Thus, I review the F&R de novo.
Having considered the record and the arguments offered by plaintiff, the Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's analysis. Therefore, the Court adopts the F&R (doc. 60) in its entirety. Thus, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 38) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 27th day of May, 2020.
/s/Ann Aiken
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge