From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2012
No. 12-72397 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-72397

10-15-2012

JAMES LAMONT MOORE, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. Petitioner has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) that:

(A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or
(B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the underlying offense.

No petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration shall be filed or entertained in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E).


Summaries of

Moore v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2012
No. 12-72397 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Moore v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LAMONT MOORE, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

No. 12-72397 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2012)