From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Wheeler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-1913-RC (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-1913-RC

09-30-2016

HEATHER MOORE, Petitioner, v. TOM WHEELER, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This action was commenced by the filing of a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the following reasons, the petition will be denied and this case will be dismissed.

A court entertaining an application for a writ of habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.
28 U.S.C. § 2243.

The petitioner, Heather Moore, has named the Commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") as the respondent, listed her place of confinement as the FCC, and claimed that her "custody" is based on an "FCC Administrative Ruling." Pet. at 1. "[T]he essence of habeas corpus is an attack by a person in custody upon the legality of that custody, and . . . the traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody." Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973); see generally § 2241 ("Power to grant writ"). Dismissal is required because petitioner is not a "prisoner" in custody by virtue of "order, process, judgment or decree of a court or judge of the United States" or that of a state court. Id. § 2241(c). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge DATE: September 30, 2016


Summaries of

Moore v. Wheeler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-1913-RC (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Moore v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER MOORE, Petitioner, v. TOM WHEELER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-1913-RC (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2016)