From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 13, 1984
453 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AY-308.

July 13, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Donald R. Moran, Jr., J.

Terry Moore, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Moore appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion appellant alleged that the trial court erred when it convicted and sentenced him on two counts of robbery and one count of aggravated assault, because aggravated assault is a lesser included offense of armed robbery. Appellant's motion is insufficient to support the claim for relief sought, for he does not state facts in the petition which are sufficient to show that his rights under the double jeopardy provisions of the Florida and United States Constitution have been violated. The assertion of conclusions of law without specific allegations of fact in support is not adequate in making a claim for relief under Rule 3.850. See: McElroy v. State, 436 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

The Florida Supreme Court has recently held that aggravated assault is not a necessarily lesser included offense of armed robbery. State v. Baker, 452 So. 927 (Fla. 1984).

The order denying the motion for post-conviction relief is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 13, 1984
453 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY MOORE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 13, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. State

Affirmed. See Sireci v. State, 469 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1985); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla. 1985); Smith v.…

Irby v. State

The assertion of conclusions of law without specific allegations of fact in support is not adequate in making…