From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 18, 2006
919 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D04-693.

January 18, 2006.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid (Ft. Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FLETCHER and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


On overwhelming evidence, including the fact that he was apprehended after running from the scene and with stolen property, Moore was convicted of burglary and petit theft. Despite the importuning of his public defender, he decided to take the stand and did not do well. On appeal, he contends there was a conflict of interest between the public defenders and those who represented his juvenile co-perpetrators. In fact, there was no actual conflict whatever because, among other things, the public defender's office did not represent the juveniles in court proceedings. The appellant's second point is a sentencing issue which was resolved against him by the later-decided case of State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla. 2005).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 18, 2006
919 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tori MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 18, 2006

Citations

919 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)