Opinion
87919-COA
09-12-2024
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
GIBBONS, C.J.
Laketha Charis Moore appeals from a district court order denying a motion for modification of sentence filed on November 22, 2023. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
In her motion, Moore challenged the sufficiency of the charging document and alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. "[A] motion to modify a sentence is limited in scope to sentences based on mistaken assumptions about a defendant's criminal record which work to the defendant's extreme detriment." Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). The district court may summarily deny a motion to modify if the motion raises issues that fall outside of the very narrow scope of issues permissible in such a motion. Id. at 708 n.2, 918 P.2d at 325 n.2.
Without considering the merits of Moore's claims, we conclude they fall outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify. Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err by denying Moore's motion, and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
BULLA, J., WESTBROOK, J.
HON. TIERRA DANIELLE JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE