Moore v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Moore v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr

    936 So. 2d 941 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 5 times
    In Moore, insufficiency of process or insufficiency of service of process were not reasons for the circuit court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

    On April 12, 2003, Moore filed a second motion for post-conviction relief, in which he claimed that his guilty plea was involuntary and that he was afforded ineffective assistance of counsel. This second motion was dismissed as a successive writ. Moore filed a notice of appeal, and this Court affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lee County. Moore v. State, 897 So.2d 997 (Miss.Ct.App. 2004). ¶ 10. More than five years after he was removed from ISP and placed in the general prison population, Moore filed a grievance with the MDOC's Administrative Remedy Program (ARP), claiming that he was unlawfully incarcerated.

  2. Christie v. State

    996 So. 2d 81 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008)

    ¶ 11. The State argues that the trial court was correct in dismissing Christie's motion as successive. The State relies, in part, on Moore v. State, 897 So.2d 997 (Miss.Ct.App. 2004). In Moore, the appellant pleaded guilty on October 16, 1998, to the sale and transfer of cocaine, and he also entered a separate guilty plea involving a simple possession of cocaine charge.