From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 20, 2018
541 S.W.3d 732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105040

03-20-2018

Sean M. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean Moore appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 20, 2018
541 S.W.3d 732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Sean M. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Mar 20, 2018

Citations

541 S.W.3d 732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)