From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 15, 2015
478 S.W.3d 528 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102347

12-15-2015

Johnnie Moore, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Moore (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his two points on appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims without an evidentiary hearing as his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to question victim K.P. about her reluctance to testify at trial, and (2) failing to object to the admission of the victims' clothing based on the lack of an adequate chain of custody.

The motion court's denial of Movant's Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion is affirmed. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 15, 2015
478 S.W.3d 528 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Johnnie Moore, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Dec 15, 2015

Citations

478 S.W.3d 528 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)