From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 7, 2013
114 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–4350.

2013-06-7

David Lee MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 431994CF000959A. David Lee Moore, Jr., Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 431994CF000959A.
David Lee Moore, Jr., Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's untimely motion for postconviction relief which attempted to challenge his 1996 conviction. Lafler v. Cooper, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), did not create any new fundamental constitutional right, and these decisions do not provide any exception to the time limitation for seeking postconviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(2); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 7, 2013
114 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Lee MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jun 7, 2013

Citations

114 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 114 So.3d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185 (Fla. 1st…

Phillips v. State

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. Moore v. State, 114 So.3d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185…