From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 27, 2003
108 S.W.3d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81170

March 25, 2003 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 27, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Nannette A. Baker, Judge.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


John Moore appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We find no error and affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 27, 2003
108 S.W.3d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 27, 2003

Citations

108 S.W.3d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)