From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jul 15, 1997
948 S.W.2d 276 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 70722

ORDER FILED: July 15, 1997

Appeal from Missouri Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. William L. Syler, Judge.

John M. Schilmoeller, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Genl., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Genl., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Genl., for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.



ORDER


Michael E. Moore ("Movant") appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. This is the second time this case has been before this court. Previously, we remanded this action to the motion court for a determination on Movant's claim of abandonment by postconviction counsel.See State v. Moore, 910 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App.E.D. 1995). The motion court determined that counsel's failure to file an amended 24.035 motion was attributable to Movant's action or inaction.

We now review this decision as well as the motion court's denial of Movant's pro se motion which we declined to review pending resolution of the abandonment issue. Movant has transferred the record and his brief from the first appeal. The State has not supplied us with its first brief or addressed any of the issues from the first appeal. Nevertheless, we have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jul 15, 1997
948 S.W.2d 276 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. MOORE, Movant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Jul 15, 1997

Citations

948 S.W.2d 276 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)