(Footnote omitted.) Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 S.E.2d 454) (2002). Accord Daniels v. State, 306 Ga. App. 577, 578 ( 703 S.E.2d 41) (2010).
We view the evidence on appeal from a criminal conviction in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but determine only whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction.
The following standards apply to an appeal from a criminal conviction: the evidence is construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). We evaluate sufficiency of the evidence under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), which holds that evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt."
(Footnote omitted.) Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). Viewed in its proper light, the evidence adduced on the theft charge shows that on May 4, 2003, Cairo Police Department Investigator Wandell Asbell was called to the office regarding a report of a burglary at the city's landfill.
As long as there is some evidence, even though contradicted, to support each necessary element of the State's case, the verdict will be upheld.Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). So construed, the evidence at trial was that on December 6, 2002, Georgia State Patrol Trooper Griffin stopped Estrada's car after observing it had a defective brake light and a possibly defective turn signal.
As long as there is some evidence, even though contradicted, to support each necessary element of the State's case, the verdict will be upheld.Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence was that, around 10:30 p.m. on August 24, 2001, Rizzi, a long-time clerk at the BP station and convenience store on Whitlock Avenue in Cobb County, was on duty when she saw a young man enter the store.
As long as there is some evidence, even though contradicted, to support each necessary element of the State's case, the verdict will be upheld. Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 SE2d 454) (2002). So viewed, the evidence was that in 2000, L.V., then a 13-year-old seventh grader, reported to her teacher that she had been molested, resulting in an investigation.
Moore v. State. See also Jackson v. Virginia.Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 S.E.2d 454) (2002).Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).
Moore v. State. See also Jackson v. Virginia.Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 S.E.2d 454) (2002).Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).
Holland v. State, 240 Ga. App. 169 ( 523 S.E.2d 33) (1999).Moore v. State, 254 Ga. App. 134 ( 561 S.E.2d 454) (2002). A person commits aggravated stalking when he violates a judicial order, including a condition of pretrial release, "prohibiting the behavior described in this subsection, [and] follows, places under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or places [other than his own residence] without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person."