From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
196 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 86785.

June 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Jimmie M. Edwards, Judge.

Timothy Joseph Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.


ORDER


Deandre Moore ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

It appears from the record that the Movant's name is actually spelled "Dandre."

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Helmig v. State, 42 S.W.3d 658, 665-66 (Mo.App.E.D. 2001). An extended would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
196 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Deandre MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 27, 2006

Citations

196 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Roper

(Id. at 14-25, 27-33.) The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief on June…