From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 10, 2022
CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW)

01-10-2022

Shawn Dale Moore, Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Nielsen's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 53). No. response has been filed and the time to do so has passed. LRCiv 7.2(i). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint is granted (Doc. 53).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from the filing of this Order to file his Amended Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint which shall conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to defendant Nielsen's motion (Doc. 53). 1


Summaries of

Moore v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 10, 2022
CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Moore v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Shawn Dale Moore, Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2022)