From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1931
161 S.E. 90 (N.C. 1931)

Opinion

(Filed 10 November, 1931.)

(For digest see Hollowell v. Department of Conservation, ante, 616.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Clement, J., at April Term, 1931, of FORSYTH. Error and remanded.

Peyton B. Abbott and Hastings Booe for appellant.

Ralph V. Kidd for appellee.


In Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, ante, 616, we held that an appeal from the award of one member of the Industrial Commission cannot be taken directly to the Superior Court but must first be reviewed by the full Commission. The cause is remanded with leave to the appellant to appeal to the full Commission as provided by law.

Error and remanded.


Summaries of

Moore v. Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1931
161 S.E. 90 (N.C. 1931)
Case details for

Moore v. Pipe Co.

Case Details

Full title:H. H. MOORE, EMPLOYEE, DECEASED, MRS. MAUDE MOORE, v. PINE HALL BRICK AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1931

Citations

161 S.E. 90 (N.C. 1931)
161 S.E. 90