Opinion
March, 1915.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew if this action is not diligently prosecuted. No opinion. Jenks P.J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Moore v. Otto Gas Engine Works
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
Moore v. Otto Gas Engine Works
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
Moore v. Otto Gas Engine Works
Case Details
Full title:Michael E. Moore, Respondent, v. The Otto Gas Engine Works, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1915
Citations
167 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)