From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Office Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 27, 2007
Civil No. 06-6315-TC (D. Or. Nov. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-6315-TC.

November 27, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 8, 2007. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and for the reasons stated in the defendant's motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Office Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 27, 2007
Civil No. 06-6315-TC (D. Or. Nov. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Moore v. Office Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RANDY V. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., a Delaware corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 27, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-6315-TC (D. Or. Nov. 27, 2007)