From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. North Dakota

U.S.
Feb 22, 2011
562 U.S. 1211 (2011)

Summary

ordering Moore to be barred from any future civil filings unless he pays the United States Supreme Court's docketing fees

Summary of this case from Moore v. Bertsch

Opinion

No. 10–8071.

02-22-2011

Anthony James MOORE, petitioner, v. NORTH DAKOTA.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Moore v. North Dakota

U.S.
Feb 22, 2011
562 U.S. 1211 (2011)

ordering Moore to be barred from any future civil filings unless he pays the United States Supreme Court's docketing fees

Summary of this case from Moore v. Bertsch
Case details for

Moore v. North Dakota

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. MOORE v. NORTH DAKOTA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 22, 2011

Citations

562 U.S. 1211 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 1505
179 L. Ed. 2d 294

Citing Cases

Moore v. Bertsch

See Case No. 1:11-mc-002, Docket No. 11. Judge Miller noted that Anthony Moore is an inmate at the North…

Moore v. Bertsch

In a subsequent case, District Judge Viken directed Moore to comply with Judge Kornmann's order in all future…