From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2022
Civil Action 21-4100 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-4100

03-18-2022

LINDELL MOORE and LAVETA MOORE, Plaintiffs, v. STEPHANIE AND OSCAR MORRISON, Defendants.


ORDER

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2022, after considering the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1), complaint (Doc. No. 2), and amended complaint (Doc. No. 6) filed by the pro se plaintiffs, Lindell Moore and Laveta Moore; and for the reasons stated in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED, and the plaintiffs have leave to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. The amended complaint (Doc. No. 6) is DEEMED filed;

3. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to terminate the following individuals as defendants in this action: Ceasar Mercado, Edwin Rodriguez, Nell Solaski, and Paula Griffin;

4. The amended complaint (Doc. No. 6) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

5. The clerk of court shall MARK this matter as CLOSED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2022
Civil Action 21-4100 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Moore v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:LINDELL MOORE and LAVETA MOORE, Plaintiffs, v. STEPHANIE AND OSCAR…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-4100 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2022)