From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 1, 2019
Case No. LA CV 17-04195-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 17-04195-VBF (JEM)

10-01-2019

OCTIVAN MOORE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Denying Document #34 Extension; Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; Directing Entry of Separate Judgment; Directing Separate COA Ruling

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's September 23, 2019 Motion for a Third Extension of the Objection Deadline [Document # 34] is DENIED. (2) The Petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc #1] is DENIED for lack of merit. (3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (4) Final judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order and with the R&R. As required by Fed. R. Civ. OP. 58(a), judgment will be a separate document. Dated: October 1, 2019

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 1, 2019
Case No. LA CV 17-04195-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Moore v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:OCTIVAN MOORE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

Case No. LA CV 17-04195-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)