Moore v. Local Union No. 483

1 Citing case

  1. Matrix Distribs. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Bds. of Pharm.

    34 F.4th 190 (3d Cir. 2022)   Cited 10 times

    So the Court needed to step in to limit the society's "unbridled" power to exclude a doctor from a profession based on arbitrary criteria. Id. ; see alsoMatthews v. Bay Head Improv. Ass'n , 95 N.J. 306, 471 A.2d 355, 366 (1984) ("The general rule is that courts will not compel admission to a voluntary association," but when "an organization is quasi-public, its power to exclude must be reasonably and lawfully exercised in furtherance of the public welfare related to its public characteristics."); Moore v. Loc. Union No. 483, Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, AFL-CIO , 66 N.J. 527, 334 A.2d 1, 5–6 (1975) (reviewing a union's "arbitrary" refusal to accept transferring members because union membership "affect[s] the economic welfare of the individual applicant" and the union has "public importance").