From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Knodell

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 6, 2024
No. 23-3544 (8th Cir. Jun. 6, 2024)

Opinion

23-3544

06-06-2024

Andrew Peal Moore, II, an individual Plaintiff - Appellant v. Robert J. Knodell, Director, Missouri Department of Social Services Family Support Division, in his individual capacity; Jennifer Renner, in her individual capacity; M. Ruth O'Neil, in her individual capacity; Kim Lynette Hinton; SupportKids, Inc. Defendants - Appellees


Unpublished

Submitted: June 3, 2024

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Moore appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

After careful de novo review of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Hilger v. United States, 87 F.4th 897, 899 (8th Cir. 2023) (standard of review). It is clear from the record that the domestic relations exception to federal jurisdiction divested the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate Moore's claims. See Lannan v. Maul, 979 F.2d 627, 631-32 (8th Cir. 1992) (issue dealing with child-support obligations "is clearly within domestic relations exception" to federal jurisdiction).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Moore v. Knodell

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 6, 2024
No. 23-3544 (8th Cir. Jun. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Moore v. Knodell

Case Details

Full title:Andrew Peal Moore, II, an individual Plaintiff - Appellant v. Robert J…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 2024

Citations

No. 23-3544 (8th Cir. Jun. 6, 2024)

Citing Cases

Travis v. Family Support Div. of the Mo. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

Id. A case dealing with child support obligations is “clearly within the domestic relations exception…