From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:09-CV-98 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:09-CV-98 (HL)

06-11-2012

WALTER EVERETT MOORE III, Plaintiff, v. SOPHIA JAMES and JOSH ADCOCK, Defendants.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 36), entered on May 21, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 32, 34) filed by Plaintiff be denied. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 32, 34) are denied.

___________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

Moore v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:09-CV-98 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Moore v. James

Case Details

Full title:WALTER EVERETT MOORE III, Plaintiff, v. SOPHIA JAMES and JOSH ADCOCK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:09-CV-98 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 11, 2012)