Moore v. Horel

Full title: THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HOREL, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 25, 2011

No. CIV S-02-0007 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0007 JAM DAD P.

May 25, 2011

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

On April 28, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel and a motion for permission to appeal. (Doc. Nos. 182 183.)

This action was closed on April 1, 2011. (Doc. Nos. 179 180.) On April 28, 2011, petitioner filed a notice of appeal. (Doc. No. 181.) Petitioner's appeal to the Ninth Circuit has already been processed by this court. (Doc. No. 186.) Petitioner's recently filed motions will therefore be denied as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's April 28, 2011 request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 182) is denied as moot;

2. Petitioner's April 28, 2011 request for permission to appeal (Doc. No. 183) is denied as moot; and

3. Petitioner is advised that documents filed by petitioner since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

DATED: May 24, 2011.