From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 15, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-1250 RSWL (KS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2016)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 15-1250 RSWL (KS)

08-15-2016

LOUIS JEFFREY MOORE, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: 8/15/2016

s/ RONALD S.W. LEW

RONALD S.W. LEW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 15, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-1250 RSWL (KS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Moore v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS JEFFREY MOORE, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 15, 2016

Citations

NO. EDCV 15-1250 RSWL (KS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2016)