From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1365 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1365 JAM EFB P.

March 26, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 30, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 30, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' amended motion to dismiss, docket no. 13, is granted;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations; and,

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Moore v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1365 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Moore v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY ANDREW MOORE, Petitioner, v. T. FELKER, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 26, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1365 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2009)