From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Duke Realty Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
22 Civ. 7837 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 7837 (AT)

09-15-2022

JON MOORE, Plaintiff, v. DUKE REALTY CORPORATION, SCOTT P. ANDERSON, JOHN P. CASE, JAMES B. CONNOR, TAMARA D. FISCHER, KELLY T. KILLINGSWORTH, MELANIE R. SABELHAUS, PETER M. SCOTT, III. DAVIS P. STOCKERT, CHRIST. SULTEMEIER, WARREN M. THOMPSON, and LYNN C. THURBER, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED prnsuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Feder al Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED prnsuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same r emote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Duke Realty Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
22 Civ. 7837 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Moore v. Duke Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JON MOORE, Plaintiff, v. DUKE REALTY CORPORATION, SCOTT P. ANDERSON, JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 7837 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)