From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Doe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 3, 2009
329 F. App'x 393 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-7519.

Submitted: July 30, 2009.

Decided: August 3, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:06-cv-03167-MBS).

Javan Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott Tyler, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Javan Moore appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Doe, No. 4:06-cv-03167-MBS, 2008 WL 2856979 (D.S.C. July 21, 2008). We deny Moore's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Doe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 3, 2009
329 F. App'x 393 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Moore v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:Javan MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, unknown employee of the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 3, 2009

Citations

329 F. App'x 393 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Moore v. John Doe

Javan MOORE, petitioner, v. John DOE, et al.Case below, 329 Fed.Appx. 393. Petition for writ of certiorari to…

Moore v. Byars

After review of the record and the R&R, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge applied sound legal…