Opinion
No: 1:11-CV-02157-LJO-SKO
03-09-2012
RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. JAMES W. COPNER, TRUSTEE OF THE COPNER FAMILY TRUST DATED 10/7/04, et al., Defendants.
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF JAMES W. COPNER, TRUSTEE OF THE COPNER FAMILY TRUST DATED 10/7/04 ONLY; ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff") and Defendant James W. Copner, Trustee of the Copner Family Trust dated 10/7/04 ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Defendant James W. Copner, Trustee of the Copner Family Trust dated 10/7/04, be dismissed with prejudice from this action.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that this case has been settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
___________________________
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
___________________________
Brian Mills
Attorney for Defendant James W. Copner,
Trustee of the Copner Family Trust dated
10/7/04
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant James W. Copner, Trustee of the Copner Family Trust dated 10/7/04, is dismissed with prejudice from this matter.
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement.
3. All defendants have now been dismissed; accordingly, this matter is closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE