Moore v. Continental Casualty Company

1 Citing case

  1. Moore v. Continental Casualty Co.

    252 Conn. 405 (Conn. 2000)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that a policy definition of bodily injury excluded emotional distress regardless of the fact that Connecticut law permits a tort claim for emotional distress without an accompanying physical injury

    We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine as a matter of law that a claim for emotional harm is not a claim for bodily injury under the terms of a homeowner's insurance policy." Moore v. Continental Casualty Co., 248 Conn. 918, 734 A.2d 566 (1999). This conclusion renders it unnecessary for us to consider the defendant's alternate ground for affirmance, namely, that the loss in question is not covered under the insurance policy because it could have been "reasonably expected or intended" by the insured or a covered person.