From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Conrad

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Feb 19, 2016
No. 07-15-00377-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2016)

Opinion

No. 07-15-00377-CV

02-19-2016

STEPHANIE MOORE, APPELLANT v. RAYMOND CONRAD, APPELLEE


On Appeal from the County Court Armstrong County, Texas
Trial Court No. 961, Honorable Hugh Reed, Presiding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Stephanie Moore filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2015, appealing a judgment in favor of appellee Raymond Conrad. The clerk's record was filed on November 5 and the reporter's record, on November 9. Appellant's brief was due on December 9. On December 17, the Court sent appellant notice that her brief was overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if a response was not made by December 28. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant did not file a brief or a response by this deadline. We gave appellant a similar notification by letters of January 8 and January 25, 2016, the second letter notifying appellant her appeal was subject to dismissal if her brief was not filed by February 4. Appellant has not filed a brief or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

James T. Campbell

Justice


Summaries of

Moore v. Conrad

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Feb 19, 2016
No. 07-15-00377-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Moore v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE MOORE, APPELLANT v. RAYMOND CONRAD, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Date published: Feb 19, 2016

Citations

No. 07-15-00377-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 19, 2016)