From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-297-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-297-JJB-EWD

09-26-2017

DEREK N. MOORE (#390963) v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes dated September 9, 2017 (R. Doc. 14) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. Accordingly, Petitioner's application for habeas corpus is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Further, in the event that Petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal in this case, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 26, 2017.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Moore v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-297-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Moore v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:DEREK N. MOORE (#390963) v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-297-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Sep. 26, 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Humphrey

As such, defendant fails to show "systematic exclusion" of a distinct group and is therefore not entitled to…

State v. Holliday

As such, we find the defendant fails to show "systematic exclusion" of a distinct group, and consequently,…