From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Brittian

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 1, 2022
Civil Action 21-4228 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 1, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-4228

09-01-2022

DAMEANE LEE MOORE, Petitioner, v. KATHY BRITTIAN, Respondent.


ORDER

HON. JOEL H. SLOMSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2022, upon independent consideration of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 2, 4), and any responses or replies thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pamela A. Carlos, to which no objection has been made, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 2, 4) is DENIED;

3. The motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 10, 11) are DENIED; and

4. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).

5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Brittian

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 1, 2022
Civil Action 21-4228 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Moore v. Brittian

Case Details

Full title:DAMEANE LEE MOORE, Petitioner, v. KATHY BRITTIAN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 1, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-4228 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 1, 2022)