From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Board of Education of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1909
88 N.E. 645 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued May 13, 1909

Decided June 1, 1909

Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Charles McIntyre of counsel), for appellant.

John E. O'Brien for respondent.


The appeal in this case cannot be determined on the present state of the record. We know of no reason why the entry of a judgment on the order of the Appellate Division affirming a judgment carried to it from the Municipal Court through the Appellate Term should be dispensed with any more than in the case of other appeals. The determination of this appeal will, therefore, be suspended until the successful party enters a judgment on the order of affirmance of the Appellate Division. When such a judgment is entered the defendant may take an appeal therefrom. Upon the addition of these necessary papers to the present record in this court the court will dispose of the case on its merits without requiring the parties to appear for further argument.

EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., concur; CULLEN, Ch. J., absent.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Moore v. Board of Education of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1909
88 N.E. 645 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Moore v. Board of Education of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES E. MOORE, Respondent, v . THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 1, 1909

Citations

88 N.E. 645 (N.Y. 1909)
88 N.E. 645

Citing Cases

Matter of Rockwell v. Board of Education

The Constitution provides that the Legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of…