From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 3, 2019
No. 18-6663 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-6663

01-03-2019

ROBERT GARY MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BISHOP, Warden; JOHN DOE, Commissioner (DOC); SIERRA NOLAN, LPN; KRISTA SELF, CFNP; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; RYAN BROWNING, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-01919-JKB) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Gary Moore appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Bishop, No. 1:17-cv-01919-JKB (D. Md. May 10, 2018). We deny as moot Moore's motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Moore v. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 3, 2019
No. 18-6663 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Moore v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GARY MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BISHOP, Warden; JOHN DOE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 3, 2019

Citations

No. 18-6663 (4th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019)