From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Berrill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Judgment in favor of the respondent Ferguson Son, Inc., reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless the said respondent shall elect, by filing a stipulation within ten days after the entry of the order herein, that a personal judgment in its favor may be entered against either Lillian Berrill or Thomas F. Berrill, but not against both; and, if such stipulation be filed, the said judgment in its favor is modified by striking out all provisions relating to the validity and foreclosure of the mechanic's lien filed by it and substituting in place thereof a provision that the said lien is invalid and that said respondents recover personal judgment for the amount of their claim in accordance with its election as so stipulated as aforesaid, and against the defendants William S. Moore, Sr., and Frank Nooney, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Young, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Moore v. Berrill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Moore v. Berrill

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM S. MOORE, JR., Plaintiff, v. LILLIAN BERRILL and THOMAS F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)